Where capitalism and art intersect

I’ve been thinking and reading more about this Goodreads drama (for a brief overview, see my last post). Since I was out of the drama, I don’t know the extent of this or the bullying or the retaliation by authors. I’m going to speak only in the hypothetical.

There seems to be existential questions emerging from this drama. Some people are asking why reviewers don’t just judge the book by the story and the writing opposing to by something the creator did. They are calling for works to be judged on their own merits as opposed to a certain attribute of the writer. Yet others are asking how readers can separate the author from the creative work.

I’ve been thinking about these two  ideas and where my own opinion lies, both in terms of the Goodreads drama and how I read books. But I’ve been thinking about it in the larger scheme of capitalism.

I don’t shop at Wal-Mart because I don’t want to support any of their practices. I could rant forever on how horrible they are (how their employees often are on Medicaid because Wal-Mart doesn’t pay them enough to buy health insurance or provide benefits, how they push companies out of business, how they bully employees into working overtime without compensation) but that would turn quickly into a long post. And it bothers me how so-called libertarians will shop at Wal-Mart. I’ve heard libertarians ramble about how the invisible hand of the market will solve health care and abusive employers. But only will if those same libertarians will stop shopping at the places who engage in those practices they allegedly want to stop. Thus I think any libertarian who shops at Wal-Mart is a hypocrite.

It’s not just Wal-Mart. It’s also Chick-fil-A (for other reasons), things made in sweatshops, chocolate that uses slave labor, etc. And bizarrely, I’ve been asked by libertarians why I care. It’s because the invisible hand will not work unless we care. At least, that’s a way of explaining it that they should understand. But they seem to think libertarian is the same as screw you, I’ve got mine.

I don’t think my consumption of art or entertainment should be much different. I don’t want to support authors or entertainers who engage in practices that should be discouraged. Michael Fassbender may have been hot as Magneto in X-Men First Class, but I don’t want to spend money that will eventually end up in the pockets of domestic abusers. I’d rather spend my money on the old X-Men movies and Patrick Stewart, who will spend his efforts fighting domestic violence. I know it’s a drop in the bucket. And I know some things will slip by me. But that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t try.

Of course, I don’t think anyone said the Goodread’s authors abused their spouses, used slave labor, or don’t support equal rights. But it’s still my money. I want to be informed as to where it goes. I don’t think I should have to defend that or hide that.

Read also: Goodreads; Badcensorship

Advertisements

About emmawolf

I'm a freelance writer living in Baltimore with my husband, son, and two cats. I'm working on editing my first novel. I love reading, traveling, and the cello.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Where capitalism and art intersect

  1. Muriel says:

    Well, if you care to know, I’ve got my libertarianism and my screw you, I’ve got mine strictly separated.

  2. Heather says:

    All of the claims of “bullying” on Goodreads find their way into my Twitter stream, so I know a bit about it…

    Most of what some people claim as “bullying” on GR is not bullying. And GR could have handled the few real cases of bullying just by better enforcing their no harassment policy (or whatever they call it). They didn’t need to change anything or go to such extremes. All of this really is ridiculous.

    And I don’t think it’s fair to force readers to separate someone like Orson Scott Card from his work. Many, many people “vote” with their wallets. I certainly don’t want to give my money (or any of my precious reading time) to someone like Card. And I appreciate when reviewers point these things out.

    The other problem with this is that GR is now telling reviewers what a review is or is not. That’s a very bad thing.

    (You get a huge [high five] for not shopping at WalFart. Thank you.)

  3. Pingback: Goodreads; Badcensorship. | Lucy’s Football

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s